A regional economic
development group asks municipalities to refrain from stealing each other’s
businesses
GREATER PORTLAND — As area cities and towns try to weather tough
economic times, they are being asked to refrain from attempting to steal away
each other’s businesses.
A “Prospect Protocol” – called by some an
“anti-poaching” measure – has begun circulating among the six member towns
of the Greater Portland Economic Development Corp., which finalized wording of
the document on Nov. 13.
So far, councilors in Westbrook (on Dec. 3) and
Scarborough (Dec. 19) have approved the document. Falmouth reviewed the
protocols on Nov. 26 and referred it to the town’s Economic Review Committee.
In South Portland, the Economic Development Committee gave assent Dec. 5 and
the agreement is expected to go before councilors in January.
Cape Elizabeth Town Manager Michael McGovern said
he is waiting to see what the other towns do before presenting it to his
council. Portland Economic Development Director Greg Mitchell could not be
reached for comment. However, the protocols have not appeared on any recent
council agenda in the largest GPEDC member, cited by some as the most recent
practitioner of poaching, based on reports in October that it has been working
since last spring to lure payment-processing firm WEX from South Portland to a
new development on Thompson Point.
Informal anti-poaching agreements were in place at
the time and some question how realistic it is to ask that municipalities not
go after the lowest-hanging fruit on the nearest growing tree, even when
formalized in writing.
“At the end of the day, I
am a representative for Scarborough,” said Town Councilor Jessica Holbrook,
when she and her peers reviewed the protocol on Dec. 5. “Although I like the
idea of building our base, I don’t believe this is in the best interests of
Scarborough.”
“The fact is, 99.9 percent of all economic
development in Maine is businesses moving from one town to another within the
state,” said Harvey Rosenfeld, executive director of the Scarborough Economic
Development Corp., on Friday.
But GPEDC Executive Director Tom Turner says that’s
precisely the reason his group exists, and why it’s so important that area
cities and towns not try to cannibalize each other’s tax base.
“What we’re trying to do is stop the churning of
local business, because that really doesn’t increase the size of the economic pie
for the region,” he said, last week. “For the region, that’s a zero-sum game.”
Turner, hired from the Metro Atlanta Chamber in
June to be GPEDC’s first executive director, says his group’s goal is to bring
new business into the area from out of state, and to facilitate a fair shot for
each town at that firm. Maine, he says, has promise, with quality-of-life
selling points that can countermand the strategy in Atlanta, and places like
it, to throw money at prospects.
“It was like, we’re such a miserable place, we’ll
give you $40 million to relocate here,” he said, referring to the effort as
“trolling for smokestacks.”
However, Keith Luke, a former economic development
director in Westbrook and Windham who is familiar with all the players in the
area, says the advantage may still go to the place with the most cash on hand.
There’s a strategy at play in the Thompson Point project that won’t mean much
for GPEDC’s prospect protocol.
“This poaching agreement only scratches the surface
of a much larger issue,” he said.
The prospect protocol allows municipalities to work
in secret with businesses when they request confidentiality. However, Luke
says, so much for keeping mum.
“To do that secret, practically speaking, it almost
can’t happen,” he said. “There are too many people in the mix to keep something
like that under wraps.”
Turner and Rosenfeld agree with Luke’s assessment,
and also back his assertion that real poaching is “actually quite rare.” A
municipality may create a tax increment financing deal for a specific business,
as Westbrook did for Idexx in the mid-90s, when it made the jump from Portland.
However, that deal, says Luke, was less about the tax deal – which he said is
only worth about $30,000 a year to Idexx – than the fact that Westbrook
had the facilities the firm needed at the time.
“Basically, it's less about luring a business with
deals than simply being able to show them something that meets their specific
needs, for square footage or the number of loading bays and things like that,”
said Luke.
When Westbrook adopted the prospect protocol, Mayor
Colleen Hilton said
that during recent battles between Idexx and Pike Industries regarding the
latter’s rock blasting, some communities tried to entice Idexx to abandon
expansion plans in Westbrook and relocate to their turf.
“I
think there’s a lot of precedent for setting up that protocol,” she said.
While
Hilton did not name names, Luke outed Rosenfeld, who admits to showing Idexx
around town. However, while insisting his group's policy has always been to
refrain from soliciting businesses in neighboring communities, Rosenfeld says
that if the business comes knocking, “that’s not poaching.”
Proving
Luke’s point, Scarborough did not have a site to meet the company's needs.
“We
have a lot of land, for someone who wants to build something to suit their
needs,” Rosenfeld said. “But it takes some pretty deep pockets to build it for
them.”
However,
in a case of the rich getting richer, that’s exactly what Portland did at
Thompson Point and that he says, represents an end run on the GPEDC and an “important
policy consideration for economic development on a regional basis.”
What makes Thompson Point different from standard
TIF deals that don’t stay secret for long and that name a specific business
once revealed, he said, is that Portland used its economic leverage to
“essentially underwrite construction of new, untenanted office space."
Although Portland Mayor Michael Brennan has said
Portland never engaged in direct discussion with WEX, Luke says it didn’t have
to, and not just because WEX Chief Executive Officer Michael Dubyak is a part-owner of
the Portland Red Claws basketball team, which is slated to get a stadium in the
new site.
"When Portland subsidized TIF-supported office
space, that was an indirect invitation to businesses from around the region,”
said Luke. “Assuming the council that approved it didn’t know who was going to
fill that space, they had to know that not all of it could be filled by
businesses that were new to greater Portland.”
Or, to put it another way, said
Luke, “If you build it, they will come, and they won’t be coming from far
away.”
No comments:
Post a Comment