Pages

Thursday, December 1, 2011

A healthy discussion: South Portland councilors clash over receiving free health care benefits


SOUTH PORTLAND — South Portland city councilors on Monday had an opinion from one attorney saying they are probably violating the city charter, and one from another saying they probably aren't. But after 90 minutes of vigorous debate, there was no probably about the opinion of outgoing Mayor Rosemarie De Angelis.

She called taxpayer funding of health insurance for city councilors "unfair, unequal and unethical."

The practice has been a perennial hot potato in South Portland, given its supposed violation of the charter, which fixes councilor compensation at $3,000 annually, with no mention of ancillary benefits.

Although the council reached no consensus on the question Monday, De Angelis vowed to bring the issue to a head, saying she will seek to either open a Charter Commission review of councilor pay, or else force her peers to reauthorize the 1977 order that extended Blue Cross/Blue Shield coverage to the City Council.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the council split in its deliberations Monday 4-3, with those who take the benefit – Maxine Beecher, Tom Blake, Tom Coward and Alan Hughes – in favor of continuing the practice, and those who don't – Alan Livingston and Mayor-elect Patti Smith – seeming more sympathetic to De Angelis' view.

The swing vote could be new Councilor Gerald Jalbert, who will be sworn in to office Dec. 5. Jalbert replaces Hughes on the board and has already said he will decline health care coverage from the city. However, while he will not take advantage of it himself, Jalbert has not said how he feels about others taking advantage of the benefit. His most revealing comment, made after Monday's council workshop, was to recall his time on the campaign trail this fall, reporting that many residents were "shocked" at "how little" he stood to gain, if elected. 

The prevailing opinion of most residents, according to Jalbert, Blake and Coward, is that South Portland city councilors are woefully underpaid, even with a health insurance plan valued at more than $14,000 per year for family coverage.

HISTORY LESSON

When the city charter was adopted in 1963, it stipulated, "The annual compensation of Councilmen shall be $600." The pay rate was bumped to $1,000 by the state Legislature in 1965, and then by local voters to $1,500 in 1971 and $3,000 in 1986, where it's remained ever since. However, in 1977 the City Council voted to take advantage of a 1969 change in Maine law that broadened the definition of "employee" to elected and appointed officials, for purposes of group health insurance policies. The council at that time voted itself full health insurance coverage and the benefit has been part of every annual budget ever since.

For FY 2012, the city set aside more than $98,000 for the benefit.

“That could turn back on all of our street lights,” said De Angelis, referring to the council’s unanimous vote last week to save $22,000 by snuffing 184 lights. “That could fund the last three contracts we just negotiated,” she added, pointing to pay raises contained in recently approved contracts with firefighters and police officers.

“There’s a lot of things that money could buy that serve a lot more people than the seven sitting up in front of us tonight,” said De Angelis. “I don’t take it because I couldn’t sleep at night.”

“It was OK when you were on the board before,” said Beecher, raising her voice for the first time in recent memory. “For three years you took it, and you never brought it up to take it away then.”

“Maxine, I’ve addressed that,” said De Angelis. “I said it in three different meetings, because you brought it up in three different meetings, so I’ll say it again. You’re absolutely right, Councilor Beecher, I took it for three years. But when the issue was raised, and the ethical question came forward, I did not take it again. OK? That’s my answer.”

De Angelis said she had not known of the health benefit when she first ran for office in 2003, and simply accepted what was put in front of her when she won. After losing at the polls in 2006, De Angelis ran again in 2009, shortly after a series of intensive public meetings that summer centered on councilor compensation.

However, although De Angelis says she was simply swayed by the logic presented by citizens at those sessions, her conversion may not have been as cut-and-dried as all that. Although not mentioned Monday, soon after resuming office De Angelis asked for a payout in lieu of accepting the insurance package a second time.

In a Jan. 28, 2010 memo, the city’s attorney, Sally Daggett, wrote that councilors, though deemed employees for purposes of obtaining health insurance, cannot take advantage of a personnel policy that allows employees who decline coverage to take a cash buyout equal to one-half of what the city would otherwise pay in annual premiums.

“Such differing definitions are perfectly lawful,” wrote Daggett, referencing a January 2009 memo in which she said nothing in either the charter or Maine law “expressly prohibits” councilors from declaring themselves employees for purposes of getting insurance coverage. 

In that 2009 letter, Daggett also wrote that while the charter fixes councilor compensation at $3,000, nothing says that pay is the “total” value of all compensation, “exclusive of any other benefits.”

Maine’s Supreme Court can be relied upon to back that interpretation, Daggett wrote, because voters made no effort to spike insurance coverage for councilors when voting in 1986 to hike their stipends.

SECOND OPINION

This time around, however, when De Angelis asked to have the issue readdressed, City Manager Jim Gailey chose to get a second opinion, rather than have Daggett retrace her rhetorical ground.

“It’s like me writing a paper on whether my boss should have a raise,” said Gailey, intimating that Daggett may have a conflict of interest. Daggett’s 2009 opinion that councilors should not lose health insurance coverage was written just two weeks after she was hired, Gailey pointed out.

This time around, Gailey went to attorney William Plouffe, primarily because the city does not retain his firm, DrummondWoodsum, for any other matters.

Plouffe said in a Nov. 21 memo that giving councilors health insurance coverage “does not comply with the [$3,000] compensation limit” in the charter. However, given a dearth of relevant case law, Plouffe hedged by adding “the answer is not free from doubt.”

“Getting a lawyer’s opinion isn’t worth too much,” said Highland Avenue resident Stanley Cox. “Lawyers have their livelihood arguing among themselves.”

Cox said it was clear to him that the 1977 council “sidestepped” the charter to “vote themselves a raise.”

“I feel it’s compensation under the table,” he said.

However, Cox seemed less concerned about the insurance premium than the fact that some take advantage of the benefit while others do not. Effectively, that means one councilor might earn more than $17,000 for his or her service, while another gets just $3,000.

Gary Crosby, who has run for council more than once, rose from his place beside Cox in the audience to chime in.

“I’m not opposed to the total amount of money so much as the inequity,” he said.

Not only do some councilors not take the health benefit, but also members of other boards in committees don’t even have the option, said Crosby.

Marilyn Reilly, credited with asking De Angelis to resurrect the issue, pointed to another seeming inequity. Part-time employees in South Portland must work at least 24 hours per week before the city will cover their insurance premiums, and even then they still have to pay 50 percent out of pocket. Meanwhile, nothing compels the elected official who gets full coverage to log a minimum number of hours.

“Does your heart and the pit of your stomach say that this is moral behavior toward city employees?” she asked.

REBUTTAL

 Still, there was a spirited defense staged for the status quo.

“I didn’t run for council to get health insurance, but it’s what enables me to actually to do the job,” said Coward.

The insurance coverage, said Coward, gives him a “cushion” of time he can devote to city business, because, without it, he’d have to spend his time in trying to earn enough money to buy health insurance in the marketplace.

“In the absence of health insurance, the people who can run for council are either retired people, independently wealthy, or else work for employers who provide health insurance and are very forgiving about their employees extracurricular activities,” said Coward. “What it cuts out is people like me – small entrepreneurs who run independent businesses and cannot otherwise afford to serve on the council.”

“We are a complex community and we need quality people,” agreed Blake. “By removing or grossly reducing compensation, I feel certain we will reduce the quality [of candidates for office], which is already a problem, and I feel it has the potential to reduce the quality.”

Blake suggested the creation of a “blue-ribbon commission” to study the issue, but no one else seemed interested in that idea. The best that could be had was a general agreement, apparently grudging on some parts, to debate the topic again at some future workshop session.

One issue that could be on the table at that time is taking the compensation question to a referendum vote, with an eye to offering councilors a lump sum of money with which to shop around for their own insurance coverage. That, at least, might free taxpayers from spiraling health care costs.

“I don’t think anyone in the ’70s ever thought health insurance would ever get this crazy,” said Smith, “and, in the next few years, it’s going to go through the roof.”

Coward countered that while he’s willing to debate the issue further, he felt “we’ve all laid out our positions,” making additional talks largely irrelevant, and any thoughts of raising a Charter Commission untenable.

“I’m not getting a sense that this is a burning issue with anyone except a few folks and a couple of councilors,” he said.




A closer look
What will each South Portland city councilor cost the taxpayer in FY 2012?

                                      Stipend        Health care      Total
Tom Blake                      $3,000        $14,418       $17,418
Tom Coward                  $3,000        $14,418       $17,418
Maxine Beecher             $3,000        $8,559         $11,559
Rosemarie De Angelis    $3,000        $0                 $3,000
Gerald Jalbert*               $3,000        $0                 $3,000       
Alan Livingston             $3,000        $0                 $3,000
Patti Smith                      $3,000        $0                $3,000       

*Jalbert, who will be sworn in Dec. 5, has said he will not take the health benefit.


A closer look
How councilors are compensated in Maine's largest cities

                               Stipend                              Healthcare                             Retirement                     Other         
Auburn                  $1,800 (Mayor $4,000)   No                                            No                                     None 
Bangor                  $2,000 (Chair $2,500)     No                                            No                                      Life Ins. (at cost)
Lewiston               $3,180                                No                                             Yes (2.9% match)           None
Portland               $5,812                           Yes (100% self; 47% family)    Yes (4.4-7.5% match)    Life Ins./Dental (at cost)
South Portland    $3,000                               Yes (100%)                              No                                    None
Westbrook           $3,000 (Pres. $3,500)     Yes (at cost)                              No                                    None



No comments:

Post a Comment