Nearly $1 million in property taxes for South
Portland at stake
Undaunted by the December rejection of a 2006 tax appeal,
the owners of the Maine Mall have gamely gone forward with an appeal of the
sprawling complex’s property assessment for 2009.
A series of three meetings convened in late April by
South Portland’s Board of Assessment Review will culminate in what’s described
as an “all-day” meeting on Monday, May 23. According to City Assessor Elizabeth
Sawyer, the board could decide on the case that day.
What’s at stake is nearly $1 million in property taxes
that the mall owner, Chicago-based General Growth Properties (GCP), claims it
was overbilled in 2009.
GCP, the second-largest owner of mall property in the
United States, is contesting nine of 12 lots it owns on and around the Maine
Mall.
The city values those properties at $242.7 million, using
a method of assessment for commercial revenue-producing property, which is
based largely on gross revenue realized in each store. GCP claims those
properties should only be assessed at $181.9 million, a difference of $60.9
million.
Complicating the case is the fact that Superior Court has
sealed some records at GCP’s request, as it considered the per store revenue at
the heart of the case to be proprietary information
Based on South Portland’s $14.70 per $1,000 valuation
property tax rate for 2009, the city would have to return $896,465 if it losses
the case. GCP paid $3.7 million in property taxes to South Portland in 2009.
“Every taxpayer in the city pays its fair share,” said City
Manager James Gailey. “In the Mall's case they feel they are over assessed. If
valuation is reduced, the budget is either cut due to the inability to raise
funds at an appropriate level, or every taxpayer brunt's the impact and pays
more to keep the same level of services.”
Even if the city wins, there are still costs involved. So far, the
city has piled up more than $5,000 in legal fees beating back the abatement
request, says Gailey, while the city council recently appropriated an
additional $50,000 for legal fees.
No comments:
Post a Comment